Column published in: www.InfiernoRojo.com
This weekend Independent play before me were very impressed with the lack of self-criticism in some of the protagonists of the current Clausura tournament. I heard Twin Angel Cappa and Barros Schelotto saying anything less than Estudiantes won the classic with all of the law that was just the owner of the game. Also Caranta who questioned the match referee (not directed beautifully) instead of assuming it went ahead in the prison and it was good to reiterate what or who lost the South because they played classic wrong and he ate two goals. Even Julio Cesar Falcioni heard to say that Velez had come only twice a bow and so far there was no seen a team that surpassed in Boca chances. Of course, before all this, last week had heard Carlos Matheu with less self-criticism that Chavez government in Venezuela. Following this, I began to analyze various points he had slept, perhaps not face reality Independent hitting beyond the urgency of points on the average. Then on Monday, the party and the three goals he sentenced a home now really worrying.
Beyond the game itself, what worries me is something deeper than a team playing bad football and not get good results. In support of our four-legged table: the swollen, technical staff, equipment and leadership. A priori, the only thing that works is the leg of the people, therefore, is not enough. But going by parts: 1 .-
People: with too much patience goes on to say this, banking and despite angry about the bad results, encourages and even when you are going the anger of the moment, renewed hope. Of course there are those who analyze a little more and are concerned about the present also institutional. Still, think independently and follow bench.
2 .- The coaching staff. Exhausted, Antonio Mohamed, who was a player and knows how to handle certain issues, there is a limited stock and airs. His decision have no more priority and Lucas Andrew Silvera Mareque you mean a problem in the locker room. The discussion with the captain, Carlos Matheu, adds an even greater problem. To this we must add that the technician asked players who never arrived and have made the odd complaint subtle told reporters brought some tension with the leadership or, more precisely Compared with July of course, was not welcomed , the ironies of the Turkish left it exposed the lack of reinforcements and of course, creates problems. Continue in the Copa Libertadores Turco certainly gives some back, but: How long can hold a team without much spare and some discomfort for decisions no team like them when the gun? 3 .-
team. Some of what I explained with the Turk is here too. The truth is that the campus instead of taking their limitations, making a hard self-criticism in terms of performance, choose offended by decisions that do not like and there begin the twists and turns that are good for the Independent, of course. Do not assume the reality of the average, however, the local tournament play outside and it seems that there is no way of getting the desire that wins the Copa Libertadores. 4 .-
leaders. Before discussing this point there is something to be clarified. The president is Julius Comparative Independent and well. Elected by the majority. Are those in banking and who not, and is respectable. Those who want to continue to support this year, there are choices. Those who disagree with management will have the opportunity to be heard. That is democracy and we must learn to exercise it. Made the clarification, I say. Independent has a shortage of players for two decades. The part that corresponds to the current leadership, of course, must be the result of analysis on the Executive Committee meetings.
remember when I was hired Cesar Luis Menotti, the current president said that Hardy came because it took her errors when choosing contracts and also his presence would generate enthusiasm on players to come and tour to raise money immediately arise. No need to detail what happened to Hardy and after his departure was not just anybody but continued to recruit players. I wonder, considering the quality of some of the contracts. Any Independent Counsel, which advises the Board of Directors certain contracts and then contracts weapon? Is it useful? Is the department assumes the Independent Football successive chain of embarrassing events and continues in his role or should definitely take his lack of capacity and to step aside? It is noteworthy that no ill will interpret. I assume that everyone has good intentions but I can not accept not to recognize shortcomings and their inability to resolve certain issues and not resolve to step aside. I can not believe that nobody sees what is happening and say, "Guys, I'm clearly not up to the circumstances and I must step aside to take on someone who falls short of the circumstances." I can not understand.
Another thing that catches my attention and I really wonder is. How is it possible that Borghi, Falcioni and even Troglio have failed as they did in the Independent and later been moved to Argentine champions, Banfield and Cerro Porteno respectively? Sure, many will say, "But Borghi failed in Boca and watch how you're going to Falcioni. To which I say: levels up and ultimately Boca has the same problems as Independent. Economic problems, issues and problems dirigenciales football. Boca and Independiente in some way and each with their differences, are a mirror. Thus, if the other teams achieved the goal and went independent for all we know. Who has the problem: Independent or three different coaches? It would be foolish not to assume that the problem is independent.
The economic battle is another point if you consider the dire contracts, stadium, debts and bounced checks. Give just one example of checks before it leaves one to desmentírmelo: Lucas Pusineri, type that was independent of the back door without saying a word, independent guy who loves and adores people, received eight checks for a debt that stays with him. Result? Eight checks were bounced for insufficient funds. Sure, I probably would say the school, a social club, which courts, that the sea by car. Guys, what is well done is what is relevant and I need not repeat it constantly, I have it clear, is what should happen. What makes my hair stand on end is what is wrong, leading to the Independent is how it is in the standings, on average, in the institutional.
If we assume some of these issues and pointed to my humble opinion must be analyzed and should be taken in the matter, the Independent will sink more and more. If I want the Copa Libertadores? I always want what is mine but I must admit that point to it and move on, pull the ground under the carpet and not allowed to take the constraints and the sad reality.
course, many will say to me: "To these we owe the South American players." I correct, these players owe their present to the South American and we will not put to debate the quality of opponents and arbitrations in more than one occasion left doubts about the honesty some determinations. He won the Cup, it is true, but it is also true that the finalist was a team down and the "efforts" in the pre-final matches were valid but no left without exposing the limitations of the squad that won eager with more grip than football and now they themselves are angry or do not take the same "oomph" to get the awful Independent zone "promiedo", which is unprecedented for an institution as an Independent but no longer a reality . Being self-critical
not fight, is not angry because they say certain things you do not like. Self-criticism is to assume and act accordingly. Knowing the limitations, learn from mistakes and deeper into the answers. That way it goes ahead, that way it grows, it manages to be better.
0 comments:
Post a Comment